Honestly, I just want a "fun" and "easy-going" module that can multi-role while simultaneously being able to go air to air while not being micro intensive in managing TWS, radar scope & etc. So recommendations between the SU-33 and MIG-29? Many thanks all! A navalized Flanker variant also exists, the Su-33 ā€œFlanker-D,ā€ which is used aboard Russia’s Admiral Kuznetsov carrier. the MiG-29, much like the Su-27, was designed to compete with the

The MiG-29 is the Ukrainian air The powerful but short-ranged fighters with their smoky RD-33 engines almost certainly outnumber Ukraine’s best jets, the roughly three-dozen Su-27s that

According to BBC’s analysis, Indian defence analyst Maroof Raza stated that Rafale can be called a ā€˜force multiplier’ due to its stealth features. He added that its operational capacity is 65 to 70 per cent, while the Sukhoi fighter jet has an operational capacity of 50 per cent. ā€œIt can land in mountainous areas and small places, and
The MiG-29’s twin RD-33 turbofan engines gave it excellent acceleration and a top speed of Mach 2.25—faster than the F-16 but a bit behind the larger F-15. Like the Su-27, the MiG-29 is
The MiG-29K is however a multi-role, and quite capable of carrying out strike missions using both the Kh-29, Kh-31, as well as the Kh-25 and Kh-35U. The Su-33 is rumoerd to have the ability to carry Kh-41 (SS-N-22 Sunburn). Both have mid-air refueling capability. The MiG-29K would presumably also be a more modern fighter. phpjJGY. 110 289 250 435 477 59 359 191 99

mig 29 vs su 33