Both engines seem to use the same transmission and gearing, except the 2L has a slightly shorter final drive ratio to make up for the smaller displacement. During my experience with both cars, I found the 2.5L to be a far better match to the SKYACTIV transmission, especially when downshifting.
When the pickup screen disc gets clogged (From running it below 1/4 tank), the fuel pump doesn't get it's necessary fuel and starts raising voltage thinking it's a pressure issue due to lack of fuel volume, which could explain the relay burning up/shorting out. This also explains why the pump is now bad. Ford has used this design of fuel pumps 8 posts · Joined 2020. #19 · Sep 16, 2020. I got a 05 mazda 6 2.3 an my haynes book says the cylinder numbers are 1234 starting from passenger side and the firing order it says 1342. Whats getting me is all the different answers ive seen. Duratec/Ford from a Ford fusion. Taking advantage of the fact that when the NC was designed, Ford still had ownership of Mazda. This motor is close to identical to the 2.0 that came in the car. The 2.5 is just about half an inch taller overall. Otherwise the swap consists of essentially moving all your acce I would like to chip in a minute, I own a 2019 AWD Mazda 3 hatch, automatic, and on 87 gas, I get 26 mpg on the freway, and on 91 gas, I get 32 mpg, and thats been a constant, same route, same time of night, with AC on, same speeds, there is a mpg difference, and i have been doing this for 6 months now, and the engine idles smoother too, power pN9uR. 63 494 401 137 9 337 322 394 108mazda 6 2.5 lpg forum
